THE NEW APPROACH TO MEASURING COMPUTER LITERACY AT THE UWB
Keywords:
computer literacy, computer education, computer skills, assessmentAbstract
Nowadays computer literacy is one of the required conditions demanded by employer, who wants to success in today’s labor market. Unfortunately so called necessary minimum of knowledge is not exactly defined. In the Czech Republic computer literacy is an important part of basic education. Our educators face the difficult issue of assessing a level of computer literacy among our students. This case study compares two tools used for testing of computer literacy. For this study we selected two testing tools, the Original Testing System (OTS) and the Modified Testing System (MTS), and investigated them thoroughly by quantitative comparison. In our case study, this quantitative comparison of those testing tools was done using data collected from a freshman-level Word and Excel course in fall 2010 semester in the University of West Bohemia (UWB). Comparison was based on analysis of the performance of 138 students attending this course. We analyzed correlations between the scores from our two testing instruments. We conducted a paired sample t-test for the sake of comparison of the students’ performance between the examination scores. This study has limitations, which were discussed and based on them, recommendations for future works and directions were included.
References
Berger F.C., Carlson E.A. (1988) ‘Measuring computer literacy of teacher trainers’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 287-301.
Computer Skills Placement (2010) Benefits & Features [online], Available: http://www.csplacement.com/csp_benefits.html.
Certiport (2010) IC3 certification [online], Available: http://www.certiport.com/portal/DesktopDefault.aspx.
Creighton, W., Kilcoyne, M., Tarver, R. and Wright, S. (2006) ‘Computer literacy levels of students enrolling in a post-secondary computer applications/information technology course’, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 15-23.
Education Testing Service (2010) iCritical thinking certification [online], Available: http://www.ets.org/icriticalthinking/about.
European Computer Driving Licence Foundation (2010) About ECDL Foundation [online], http://www.ecdl.com/publisher/index.jsp.
Gavora, P. (2000) Úvod do pedagogického výzkumu. Brno: Padio.
Hess C.A. (1994) ‘Computer literacy: An Evolving Concept’, Journal of the School Science and Mathematics, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 208-214.
Hoffman, M., Blake, J. (2003) ‘Computer literacy: today and tomorrow’, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 221-233.
Honey, M., Pasnik, S., Fasca, C. (2006) Is having the right answer enough? Developing new forms of assessment for 21st century learning [online], Available: http://www.ciconline.org/thresholdspring06.
Chráska, M. (1999) Didaktické testy, Brno: Paido.
Kontos G. (2007) A Survey: A Simple Tool to Measure Computer Literacy, [online], http://works.bepress.com/george_kontos/1.
Lockheed M.E., Hunter B., Anderson R.E., Beazley R.M., Esty E.T. (1983) Computer Literacy: Definition and Survey Items for Assessment in Schools. Educational Testing Service. Prepared for the National Center for Education Statistics under contract with the U.S. Department of Education.
National Assessment Agency (2010) The essential guide to the key stage 3 ICT test [online], Available: http://www.naa.org.uk/naaks3.
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2010) Key stage 3 ICT onscreen assessment tasks [online], http://www.qcda.gov.uk/assessment/6555.aspx.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.