ANALYSE: THE COMPARISON OF CZECH AND FOREIGN ASP / SAAS PROVIDERS

Authors

  • Daniela Beer University of Economy Prague

Keywords:

ASP, SaaS, the comparison of the ASP market, the difference between ASP and SaaS, ASP / SaaS trends, business ASP, enterprise ASP, vertical market ASP, function oriented ASP, ASP aggregators

Abstract

This report gives an overview of the current Application Service Provider´s (ASP) market, especially the offered services. A questionnaire was sent to more than 20 companies which offer some kind of ASP / SaaS, but none of them replied. For this reason all comparisons were done only on the basis of their websites. Chapter three gives an overview of ASP and SaaS definitions, as well as describing the differences between the two. The analysis is focused on the comparison of Czech and foreign companies. Czech companies were compared in accordance with the survey. As the foreign companies offered all services inquired in the survey given to Czech companies, comparison was instead based on the classification of the kind of ASP models offered such as business ASP, enterprice ASP, functional oriented ASP, vertical market ASP and ASP aggregators. At the end of this report, some trends in the ASP market are mentioned.

Additional Files

Published

2008-10-30

How to Cite

Beer, D. (2008) ’ANALYSE: THE COMPARISON OF CZECH AND FOREIGN ASP / SAAS PROVIDERS’, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 20–37. Retrieved from https://www.eriesjournal.com/index.php/eries/article/view/8

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2008)

Section

Research Paper

License

Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:

  • all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
  • all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
  • no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
  • the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
  • submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
  • experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
  • grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.

Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.