Mobile Augmented Reality in Biological Education: Perceptions of Austrian Secondary School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160203Keywords:
Augmented reality, Biology, Education, Secondary school, STEM, TeachersAbstract
Today's teachers play a critical role in preparing students for the integration of educational technologies, such as augmented reality (AR), into their lessons. It is thought that AR implementation improves collaboration, motivation, and learning outcomes. Considering this, this study aims to determine the teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and obstacles of employing mobile AR applications (mAR) in their biology education, along with suggestions for practice, app developers, and policymakers. Therefore, a mixed-methods study was used to examine Austrian secondary school biology teachers’ opinions. A questionnaire containing open-ended and closed-ended questions was distributed to 35 teachers. Descriptive statistics were employed to process quantitative data, whereas grounded theory was utilized to process qualitative data. According to the findings, biology teachers likely utilize mAR apps to teach about human anatomy or to identify living things (e.g., plant determination). According to the teachers, mAR can improve students’ learning outcomes, motivation, and collaboration, and further their enthusiasm for learning biology. The main obstacles that teachers encounter whilst integrating mAR into their lessons are lack of technical devices, Internet issues, inconsistency with the curriculum, and questionable scientific accuracy of information. Despite the promising results, additional future studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
References
Agency for Education and Internationalization (OeAD) (2021) Learning App, [Online], Available: https://www.oead.at [8 Aug 2022].
Ajit, G., Lucas, T., Kanyan, R. (2021) ‘A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality in STEM Education’, Studies of Applied Economics, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp.1–22. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4280
Akçayır, M. and Akçayır, G. (2017) ‘Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature’, Educational Research Review, Vol. 20, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
Anđić, B., Cvjetićanin, S., Maričić, M. and Stešević, D. (2021) ‘Sensory perception and descriptions of morphological characteristics of vegetative plant organs by the blind: Implementation in teaching’, Journal of Biological Education, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1687107
Anđić, B., Kadic, S., Grujicic, R. and Malidžan, D. (2018) ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Attitudes of Primary School Students and Teachers Regarding the Use of Games in Teaching’, IAFOR Journal of Education, Vol. 6, No. 22, pp. 5–16. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.2.01
Anđić, B., Šorgo, A., Stešević, D., and Lavicza, Z. (2022) The factors which influence the continuance intention of teachers in using the interactive digital identification key for trees in elementary school science education, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 18, No. 8, em2140. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12239
Arena, F., Collotta, M., Pau, G. and Termine, F. (2022) ‘An Overview of Augmented Reality’, Computers, Vol. 11, No. 2, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers11020028
Barrow, J., Sands, A. and Hurst, W. (2019) ‘Augmented Reality for Enhancing Life Science Education’, Proceedings of the fourth International Conference on Applications and Systems of Visual Paradigms (VISUAL 2019), [Online], Available: https://www.iaria.org/conferences2019/VISUAL19.html [8 Aug 2022].
Bahng, E. and Lee, M. (2017) ‘Learning Experiences and Practices of Elementary Teacher Candidates on the Use of Emerging Technology: A Grounded Theory Approach’, International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 225–241. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017236118
Berry, A.M. and Wintle, S.E. (2009) ‘Using Laptops to Facilitate Middle School Science Learning: The Results of Hard Fun’, Maine Education Policy Research Institute, Vol. 115.
Bogomolova, K., van der Ham, I. J., Dankbaar, M. E., van den Broek, W. W., Hovius, S. E., van der Hage, J. A. and Hierck, B. P. (2020) ‘The effect of stereoscopic augmented reality visualization on learning anatomy and the modifying effect of visual‐spatial abilities: A double‐center randomized controlled trial’, Anatomical sciences education, Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1941
Bowers, A. W. and Creamer, E. G. (2021) ‘A grounded theory systematic review of environmental education for secondary students in the United States’, International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1770446
Çakır, N. G., Gokhan and Çelik, C. (2021) ‘Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into the 5E learning model in Biology teaching’, International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 93–112. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.82
Celik, C., Guven, G. and Cakir, N. K. (2020) ‘Integration of mobile augmented reality (MAR) applications into biology laboratory: Anatomic structure of the heart. Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 28, No. 2 pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2355
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2002) Research methods in education, London: Routledge.
Dakeev, U., Pecen, R., Yildiz, F. and Clint, E. (2021) ‘Effect of an Augmented Reality Tool in Early Student Motivation and Engagement’, Proceedings of the 2020 CIEC, https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2-370-38705
Elmqaddem, N. (2019) ‘Augmented reality and virtual reality in education. Myth or reality?’, International journal of emerging technologies in learning, Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 234–242. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9289
Fan, W. and Yan, Z. (2010) Factors Affecting Response Rates of the Web Survey: A Systematic Review, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 132–139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
Federal Ministry of Education, Science, and Research (2019) Curriculum, [Online], Available: https://www.bmbwf.gv.at [8 Sep 2022].
Federal Ministry of Education, Science, and Research (2021) Seal of Quality for Learning Apps, [Online], Available: https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/Ministerium/staatspreise-auszeichnungen/praz_b/lernapps.html [7 Aug 2022].
Fernandez, M. (2017) ‘Augmented-Virtual Reality: How to improve education systems’, Higher Learning Research Communications, Vol 7, No. 1, pp 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Fuchsova, M. and Korenova, L. (2019) ‘Visualisation in Basic Science and Engineering Education of Future Primary School Teachers in Human Biology Education Using Augmented Reality’, European Journal of Contemporary Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 92–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2019.1.92
Garcia‐Bonete, M. J., Jensen, M. and Katona, G. (2019) ‘A practical guide to developing virtual and augmented reality exercises for teaching structural biology’, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21188
Godoy Jr., C. H. (2021) ‘Augmented Reality for Education: A Review’, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 39–45. https://doi.org/10.38124/IJISRT20JUN256
Huang, T. C. (2017) ‘Seeing creativity in an augmented experiential learning environment’, Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 18, pp. 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0592-2
Hsu, Y. S., Lin, Y. H. and Yang, B. (2017) ‘Impact of augmented reality lessons on students' STEM interest’, Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0039-z
Ibáñez, M. B. and Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018) ‘Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review’, Computers & Education, Vol. 123, pp. 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
İpek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, S. and Erkoç, F. (2020) ‘Opinions of Biology Teachers about Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Education in Turkey’, International Journal of Progressive Education, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 205–222. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.15
Irwansyah F. S., Yusuf, Y. M., Sugilar, H., Nasrudin, D., Ramdhani, M. A. and Salamah, U. (2019) ‘Implementation of fun science learning to increase elementary school students' skill in science and technology’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012063
Jang, J., Ko, Y., Shin, W. S. and Han, I. (2021) ‘Augmented reality and virtual reality for learning: An examination using an extended technology acceptance model’, IEEE Access, Vol. 9, pp. 6798–6809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048708
Jumani, A. K., Siddique, W. A., Laghari, A. A., Ahad, A. and Abdullah. A. K. (2022) Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality for Education, Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003196686-9
Karacan, C. G. and Akoglu, K. (2021) ‘Educational Augmented Reality Technology for Language Learning and Teaching: A Comprehensive Review’, Shanlax International Journal of Education, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 68–79. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i2.3715
Krippendorff, K. (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, 3rd edition, California, CA: Sage.
Kuleto, V. and Paun, D. (2022) ‘”New Perspectives on Virtual and Augmented Reality: Finding New Ways to Teach in a Transformed Learning Environment”, Edited by Linda Daniela, Routledge, Book Review’, EdTech journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 81–88. https://doi.org/10.18485/edtech.2022.2.1.6
Ke, F. and Hsu, Y.C. (2015) ‘Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning’, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 26, pp. 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.003
Maloney, K. M. (2005) ‘Adventuring: A grounded theory discovered through the analysis of science teaching and learning’, The Grounded Theory Review: An international journal, Vol. 4, No. 3.
Mikropoulos, T. A., Katsikis, A., Nikolou, E. and Tsakalis, P. (2003) ‘Virtual environments in biology teaching’, Journal of Biological Education, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655879
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis, Thousand Oaks: SAGE
Mystakidis, S., Christopoulos, A. and Pellas, N. (2022) ‘A Systematic Mapping Review of Augmented Reality Applications to support STEM Learning in Higher Education’, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 29, pp. 1883–1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10682-1
Osadchyi, V. V., Valko, N. V. and Kuzmich, L. V. (2021) ‘Using augmented reality technologies for STEM education organization’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012027
Omurtak, E. and Zeybek, G. (2022) ‘The effect of augmented reality applications in biology lesson on academic achievement and motivation’, Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 55–74. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.1059283
Radu, I. (2012) ‘Why should my students use AR? A comparative review of the educational impacts of augmented-reality’, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 313–314. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2012.6402590
Petrov, P. D. and Atanasova, T. V. (2020) ‘The Effect of augmented reality on students' learning performance in stem education’, Information, Vol. 11, No. 4, 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11040209
Restivo, T., Chouzal, F., Rodrigues, J., Menezes, P. and Lopes, J. B. (2014) Augmented reality to improve STEM motivation. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON), pp. 803–806. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826187
Saidin, N., Abd Halim, N. D. and Yahaya, N. (2015) ‘A Review of Research on Augmented Reality in Education: Advantages and Applications, International Education Studies, Vol. 8. No. 13, https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p1
Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C. and Caranikas-Walker, F. (2011) ‘Effects of technology Immersion on Middle School students' Learning Opportunities and Achievement’, The Journal Educational Research, Vol. 104, No. 5, pp. 299–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671003767615
Sırakaya, M. and Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2020) ‘Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review’, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 1556–1569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques, Newbury Park, Calif: SAGE.
Tan, S. and Waugh, R. (2013) ‘Use of virtual-reality in teaching and learning molecular biology’, in Cai, Y. (ed.) 3D immersive and interactive learning, pp. 17–43. Singapore: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4021-90-6_2
Tobinski, D. and Cyra, K. (2021) ‘Digital Competence of Teachers - An Exploratory Study of Teachers’ Usage of Digital (Educational) Technologies and Their Motivation Before the Sars-COV-2 Pandemic’, Proceedings of the INTED2021 Conference. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.1392
Urban, H., Pelikan, G. and Schranz, C. (2022) ‘Augmented Reality in AEC Education: A Case Study, Buildings, Vol. 12, No. 4, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040391
Wahyu, Y., Suastra, I. W., Sadia, I. W. and Suarni, N. K. (2020) ‘The Effectiveness of Mobile Augmented Reality Assisted Stem-Based Learning on Scientific Literacy and students' Achievement’, International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 343–356. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13324a
Yapıcı, İ. Ü. and Karakoyun, F. (2021) ‘Using augmented reality in biology teaching’, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 40–51. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2021.9.3.286
Zhou, R., Wang, X., Zhang, L. and Guo, H. (2017) Who tends to answer open-ended questions in an e-service survey? The contribution of closed-ended answers. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1274–1284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381165
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eva Schmidthaler, Branko Anđic, Mathias Schmollmüller, Barbara Sabitzer, Zsolt Lavicza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
