Identifying the Factors Influencing Mathematics Teachers' Grading Practices Regarding Students' In-Class Performance: A Reliability and Validity Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160304Keywords:
Grading, Mathematics, Participation in classroom activities, Performance assessment, Scale developmentAbstract
This study aims to develop a scale to identify the factors influencing mathematics teachers' grading practices regarding students' in-class performance. The study was carried out with 180 secondary and 140 high school mathematics teachers from the southwestern region of Türkiye. The scale’s construct validity was determined using item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The EFA results showed that the scale consisted of a 5-point Likert-type scale with 36 items under eight factors (mathematical knowledge and skills, social behaviors, affective skills, effort, homework performance, follow-up test results, academic exam results, and external benchmarks). The scale explained 70.02% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from 0.50 to 0.92. The item-total correlations ranged from 0.36 to 0.64, and t-test results for the item discrimination index were significant. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was calculated to be 0.92. The CFA results indicated that the scale model had a good fit (Chi-square/df = 1.39; RMSEA = 0.051; IFI = 0.98; NNFI = 0.97; CFI= 0.98; and SRMR = 0.062). Based on the findings, the scale is a valid and reliable instrument that may be used in determining the factors influencing mathematics teachers’ grading practices.
References
Acar-Erdol, T. and Yıldızlı, H. (2018) ‘Classroom assessment practices of teachers in Turkey’, International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 587–602. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11340a
Adams, T. L. and Hsu, J.-W. Y. (1998) ‘Classroom assessment: Teachers’ conceptions and practices in mathematics’, School Science and Mathematics, Vol. 98, No. 4, pp. 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17413.x.
Akcadag, T. (2010) ‘Öğretmenlerin ilköğretim programındaki yöntem teknik, ölçme ve değerlendirme konularına ilişkin eğitim ihtiyaçları [The training needs of teachers concerning methods & techniques and assessment & evaluation in the primary school curriculum]’, Bilig, Vol. 53, pp. 29–50.
Birgin, O. and Baki, A. (2009) ‘An investigation of primary school teachers’ proficiency perceptions about measurement and assessment methods: The case of Turkey’, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 681–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.119
Birgin, O. (2011) ‘Pre-service mathematics teachers' views on the use of portfolios in their education as an alternative assessment method’, Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 710–721.
Birgin, O. and Baki, A. (2012) ‘Investigation of the purposes of the measurement and assessment practice of primary school teachers within the context of the new mathematics curriculum’, Education and Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7–74.
Bennett, R. E. (2011) ‘Formative assessment: A critical review’, Assessment in Education Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) ‘Assessment and classroom learning’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Brookhart, S. M. (1993) ‘Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values’, Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb01070.x
Brookhart, S. M. (1994) ‘Teacher’s grading: Practice and theory’, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0704_2
Bursuck, W., Polloway, E. A., Plante, L., Epstein, M. H., Jayanthi, M., and McConeghy, J. (1996) ‘Report card grading and adaptations: A national survey of classroom practices’, Exceptional Children, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299606200402
Cheng, L. and Sun, Y. (2015) ‘Teachers’ grading decision making: Multiple influencing factors and methods’, Language Assessment Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1010726
Cheng, L. and Wang, X. (2007) ‘Grading, feedback, and reporting in ESL/EFL classrooms’, Language Assessment Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300701348409
Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S. M. and Rachor, R. A. (1995) ‘Teachers’ assessment practices: preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink’, Educational Assessment, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3
Cross, L. H. and Frary, R. B. (1999) ‘Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike’, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 53–92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1201_4
Demir, M., Tananis, C. A. and Basbogaoglu, U. (2018) ‘Comparative investigation of alternative assessment methods used in Turkey and United States elementary 4th grade mathematics curriculum’, International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, Vol. 10, No. 7, pp. 72–82. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2018.0561
Demir, M., Tanasis, C. A. and Trahan, K. W. (2019) ‘Evaluation of alternative assessment methods used in elementary schools’, Education and Science, Vol. 44, No. 197, pp. 223–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.6272
DeVellis, R. F. and Thorpe, C. T. (2021) Scale development: Theory and applications, London: Sage Publications.
Duncan, C. R. and Noonan. B. (2007) ‘Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment practices’, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.11575/ajer.v53i1.55195
Field, A. (2005) Discovering statistic using SPSS for Windows, 2nd edition, London: Sage Publication.
Frary, R. B., Cross, L. H. and Weber, L. J. (1993) ‘Testing and grading practices and opinions of secondary teachers of academic subjects: Implications for instruction in measurement’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00539.x
Gullickson, A. R. (1985) ‘Student evaluation techniques and their relationship to grade and curriculum’, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1985.10885657
Guskey, T. (2011) ‘Five obstacles to grading reform’, Educational Leadership, Vol. 69, No. 3, pp. 17–21.
Kline, R. B. (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 4th edition, New York: The Guilford Press.
McMillan, J. H. (2001) ‘Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices’, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
McMillan, J. H., Myran, S. and Workman, D. (2002) ‘Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices’, The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596593
Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2014) Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı okul öncesi eğitim ve ilköğretim kurumları yönetmeliği [Ministry of National Education regulation on pre-school education and primary education institutions], Ankara: MoNE
Ministry of National Education (MoNE) (2018) Matematik dersi öğretim programı [Primary school mathematics curriculum (1st-8th grade)], Ankara: MoNE
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Özenç, M. and Çakir, M. (2015) ‘Exploring primary school teachers’ competencies of alternative assessment and evaluation’, Elementary Education Online, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 914–933. https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.22900
Randall, J. and Engelhard, G. (2010) ‘Examining the grading practices of teachers’, Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
Serin, G. (2015) ‘Alternative assessment practices of a classroom teacher: alignment with reform-based science curriculum’ Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 277–297. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1330a
Shepard, L. A. (2000) ‘The role of assessment in a learning culture’, Educational Researcher, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004
Stiggins, R. J. (1997) Student-centered classroom assessment, 2nd edition, Old Tappan, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Sun, Y. and Cheng, L. (2014) ‘Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values assigned’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.768207
Suurtamm, C., Koch, M., and Arden, A. (2010) ‘Teachers’ assessment practices in mathematics: Classrooms in the context of reform’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 399–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.497469
Tabachnick, B. G. and Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edition, Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Veldhuis, M., Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Vermeulen, J. A. and Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2013) ‘Teachers' use of classroom assessment in primary school mathematics education in the Netherlands’, Cadmo, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 35–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/CAD2013-002004
Wiliam, D. (2011) ‘What is assessment for learning?’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 3–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
Yıldızlı, H. (2020) ‘Classroom assessment practices and student goal orientations in mathematics classes’, Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 294–323. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.13m
Zhang, Z. and Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003) ‘Classroom assessment practices and teachers' self-perceived assessment skills’, Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4
Zhao, X., den Heuvel-Panhuizen, V., and Veldhuis, M. (2016) ‘Teachers’ use of classroom assessment techniques in primary mathematics education-an explorative study with six Chinese teachers’, International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 3, No. 19, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0051-2
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Osman Birgin, Murat Yılmaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors declare with this manuscript intended for publication to ERIES Journal that:
- all co-authors agree with the publication of the manuscript even after amendments arising from peer review;
- all co-authors agree with the posting of the full text of this work on the web page of ERIES Journal and to the inclusion of references in databases accessible on the internet;
- no results of other researchers were used in the submitted manuscript without their consent, proper citation, or acknowledgement of their cooperation or material provided;
- the results (or any part of them) used in the manuscript have not been sent for publication to any other journal nor have they already been published (or if so, that the relevant works are cited in this manuscript);
- submission of the manuscript for publication was completed in accordance with the publishing regulations pertaining to place of work;
- experiments performed comply with current laws and written consent of the Scientific Ethics Committee / National Animal Care Authority (as is mentioned in the manuscript submitted);
- grant holders confirm that they have been informed of the submitted manuscript and they agree to its publication.
Authors retain copyright and grant ERIES Journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the published work with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. Moreover, authors are able to post the published work in an institutional repository with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ERIES Journal. In addition, authors are permitted and encouraged to post the published work online (e.g. institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
